Stravinsky’s ‘The Rite of Spring’; a work that led to
fisticuffs on its first performance, and something I’ve always had trouble
listening to. One night last summer, I was forced to pump up the volume on my
stereo in order to give a little hint to the Clampitts downstairs that whatever
social event they were having in their so-called garden, it was quite unacceptable
at half-past midnight. I’d hoped that ‘The Rite’ would chase them off, but they
were impervious to it, and not just because they were a bunch of (not
recovering) alcoholics.
As far as I know, not a single punch was thrown at the
Glasgow Royal Concert Hall last night, though if I had been Deneve, I’d have
had very strong words with whoever was responsible for maintaining the
hearing-aid loop, which was whistling like crazy throughout the concert. Last
night may just have been the night when I stopped fearing this piece and
started to believe that I could actually enjoy it. The augmented orchestra
helped, although the BBC SSO appears to be able to achieve that kind of noise
with just a couple of extra brass players. Following the lead of both Bill
Chandler and Deneve, himself, I decided to concentrate on the complicated
rhythms of the work, instead of looking for a memorable tune, and this appears
to be the key to cracking the code of ‘The Rite’.
Prior to the concert, Associate Leader, William Chandler,
who hasn’t aged much in the 20 years since he joined the orchestra, gave a very
entertaining and informative talk on the evening’s programme. He waxed lyrical
about Debussy’s impressionist style and told of the row that accompanied the
commissioning of Samuel Barber’s Violin Concerto, before relating the tale of
the fight that broke out at the premiere of ‘The Rite’ in Paris. Chandler also
alluded to the fact that the evening would see the penultimate appearance of
Stephane Deneve as Musical Director, and the Maestro himself later remarked on
his love for the word, and its bittersweet meaning last night.
What can I say about Deneve? Unfortunately, I have to start
with my shame and embarrassment at my only ever having attended one concert of
his prior to last night. He has been a breath of fresh air, and I doubt that
there are many conductors with a personality and enthusiasm to match his
(Runnicles take note). From the moment he walks on to the stage, with that mop
of curly hair trailing behind his beaming face, he exudes joy. With his little
speeches before the concert and his gestures to the players and the audience
and the end, his obvious rapport with, and love of, both the music and the
Glasgow crowd is clear to see, and he will be sadly missed. He is inimitable,
that is clear, and no one should expect to see his like again here for a long,
long time. I fear that, if his successor can’t engage with the audience in a
similar way, the RSNO may revert back to its staid, boring old self, and all
his work will have been for nought. We will see him again. He is destined to
become the new Jȁrvi, returning once a year to grace us with his charm.
What of the concert, itself? Opening with Debussy’s prelude
to the afternoon of a faun (later, I promise), with Katherine Bryan providing
the famous flute solo, Deneve had the audience eating out of his hand long
before the virtuoso, Canadian violinist James Ehnes gave us his take on
Barber’s concerto, and, not content with one encore, the Caprice No. 24 by
Paganini, he gave us a second, the Third Movement of J.S. Bach’s Third Sonata
for Violin, and all this as Deneve sat with the basses. After this, came the
interval. After that, ‘The Rite of Spring’. It was over all too soon.
Earlier in the day, I went to the Gallery of Modern Art for
more from the Glasgow International Festival of Visual Arts. I saw a pile of
sawdust, some plastic bags and sellotape put together (what else can I say?) by
Karla Black
I saw, amongst other things, items by David Shrigley and the
Turner Prize winner Martin Boyce, then I went to an exhibition of photographs
by Alan Dimmick, whose father I worked with many years ago. All of the photos
were of arty types from Glasgow, almost all of whom I had never heard of,
including the woman who was wearing a t-shirt with the words ‘Not getting it is
the new getting it’. All this modern art, and I still wasn’t getting it. If I
had thought that the sawdust was bad, I was unprepared for what I saw at the
Centre for Contemporary Arts. Sadly, the CCA, unlike GOMA, does not allow the
taking of photographs, not that there was much to snap.
First up, a projector on a pile of rubble and a little
picture on the wall near the floor. Next, an actual table tennis table, and
anyone could play. This was, apparently, ‘Ping Pong Club – Cultural Situations’
by Julius Koller. At the end of that space, Walter Sickert’s painting of Jack
the Ripper’s bedroom. In the room next door, pencil drawings, at least one of
which wasn’t suitable for the kids wandering around the place, and a video loop
of a guy tumbling down (up, actually, as it was backwards) stairs near
Woodlands Terrace. This appears to have been ‘This sort of thing shouldn’t
happen round here’ by Rob Kennedy. Back to the room with the table tennis;
three large TVs sat side-by-side, and the same video showing on all three,
again, by Rob Kennedy, entitled ‘Have faith or pandemonium’. There was also a
film in the cinema, but I have no idea what it was called. Finally, I went
upstairs to the Intermedia Gallery, where I was greeted by a large
ghetto-blaster and two video monitors on the floor. This appeared to be
something about videos of training shoes on YouTube, by someone called
Charlotte Prodger. I left, unimpressed.
When faced with such things, it might help to remember that
someone created them; someone put their heart and soul into them, whatever they
are. Not getting it is the new getting it? That’s not really the problem, is
it? People are being ‘paid’ for this; they are being lauded for this; they
expect that unsuspecting members of the general public (i.e., not just their
pretentious, arty pals) will spend time looking at whatever the hell is in
front of them. Arty farty nonsense? Art for art’s sake? Pretentious for the
sake of it? I have no idea, but, at a time like this, I feel the need to
appropriate a phrase from an e-mail I received recently: ‘if this is art, then
art is easy’.
As they day drew to a close, the ‘supermoon’ became the
focus of attention (though it turns out that it may have been at its most super
at 4am!). I was forced to resurrect my 30-year old Canon AE1, with 75-300mm
zoom and a 2x tele-converter, and I just happened to have a roll of film
sitting on a shelf. Sadly, this camera is very clunky, and my cable release
appears to jam every so often, so I have no idea what, if anything, I took pictures
of, but this is what I got with my IXUS230 compact. It just looks like any
other moon (and, according to Pete Lawrence, no more special than the last
supermoon).